IKM UKE 35 og 36 (!!!)

8 dpo detter blir spennende :nailbiting:
 

Vedlegg

  • IMG_0367.jpeg
    IMG_0367.jpeg
    380,1 KB · Visninger: 73
Håpefull ❤ skrev:
Litt av ett hopp etter dipp (festedipp?) Litt artig at tempen tegnet en krone før hoppet
Klikk for å utvide …
Haha ja la ikke merke til den krona før du påpekte det. Har også fått en katt en gang tidligere :hilarious:

Ja jeg hadde egentlig bestemt meg for at jeg ikke trodde så mye på at det var noe i festedip da jeg har lest flere plasser at det ikke er noe særlig større sjanse for å få det i en gravidchart enn i en ikke-gravidchart. Men må jo innrømme at jeg syntes tempen ble ganske spennende nå så måtte såklart google litt mer om det og kom over dette fra Fertility friend:

Is there such a thing as an implantation dip?
There is great interest in identifying very early pregnancy signs on charts. Which signs can tell you that you might be pregnant? Which are meaningless? To try to answer this question quantitatively, we have run some statistics on a large sample of charts.

One of the most controversial and puzzling potential signs has always been a luteal phase dip (Luteal Dip). There has been a lot of speculation about the significance of a temperature dip in the days after ovulation around the time implantation would be expected. We wanted to get to the bottom of the issue and find out once and for all if seeing a dip in the luteal phase, around the time of expected implantation, increased the probability of pregnancy.

Here is what we did:

We ran a statistical analysis on 1.5M+ charts recently processed by Fertility Friend, both pregnancy charts and charts that did not result in pregnancy.

To be considered as a luteal dip, charts had to show a significant temperature dip that lasted a single day, occurring between 5 and 12 days past ovulation. The dip is identified automatically by Fertility Friend pregnancy monitor.

Please note that the exact pattern is identified specifically by the pregnancy monitor Luteal Dip detector. The statistical results presented here relate only to the pattern identified. You may see on your chart something looking like a dip, but that would not mean that you could expect the same odds. Check the Luteal Dip detector report to see if your chart fits the pattern discussed here.

Here is what we found:

The dip is present in both pregnancy and non-pregnancy charts. Our detector is very selective to avoid the detection of unclear patterns as much as possible.

For pregnancy charts, the dip is observed at an average of 8.6 DPO.

This pattern is observed on 1.6% of all charts. It is pretty rare due to the selectivity of our detector.

Charts exhibiting this pattern are 79.8% more likely to be pregnancy charts than non-pregnancy charts.

The data suggest that this pattern is indeed more likely to result in a pregnancy.



Fikk jo forhåpningene opp en god del mer nå :excited001
Men gjennomsnittlig dag for festedip her var tross alt også litt senere enn min dip. Uansett spennende da!
Spørs om jeg klarer å holde meg til 13 DPO før testing denne gang.
 
Kine 95 skrev:
Ånei, det hørtes skrekkelig kjedelig ut! Kanskje ta det opp med legen? Vet ikke om det kan være progesteron, men tenker alt er verdt å teste ut i løpet om å bli gravid :)
Klikk for å utvide …
Ja jeg vurderer det. Hvis det skjer enda en syklus nå skal jeg bestille en time. :smiley-ashamed004

Skjønner ikke om EL kommer før jeg tror eller om lutealfasen er blitt kortere enn før. Jeg bruker å teste etter EL i flere dager før den blir positiv, så det er jo rart om EL skjer før det.
 
Chickpeas skrev:
Haha ja la ikke merke til den krona før du påpekte det. Har også fått en katt en gang tidligere :hilarious:

Ja jeg hadde egentlig bestemt meg for at jeg ikke trodde så mye på at det var noe i festedip da jeg har lest flere plasser at det ikke er noe særlig større sjanse for å få det i en gravidchart enn i en ikke-gravidchart. Men må jo innrømme at jeg syntes tempen ble ganske spennende nå så måtte såklart google litt mer om det og kom over dette fra Fertility friend:

Is there such a thing as an implantation dip?
There is great interest in identifying very early pregnancy signs on charts. Which signs can tell you that you might be pregnant? Which are meaningless? To try to answer this question quantitatively, we have run some statistics on a large sample of charts.

One of the most controversial and puzzling potential signs has always been a luteal phase dip (Luteal Dip). There has been a lot of speculation about the significance of a temperature dip in the days after ovulation around the time implantation would be expected. We wanted to get to the bottom of the issue and find out once and for all if seeing a dip in the luteal phase, around the time of expected implantation, increased the probability of pregnancy.

Here is what we did:

We ran a statistical analysis on 1.5M+ charts recently processed by Fertility Friend, both pregnancy charts and charts that did not result in pregnancy.

To be considered as a luteal dip, charts had to show a significant temperature dip that lasted a single day, occurring between 5 and 12 days past ovulation. The dip is identified automatically by Fertility Friend pregnancy monitor.

Please note that the exact pattern is identified specifically by the pregnancy monitor Luteal Dip detector. The statistical results presented here relate only to the pattern identified. You may see on your chart something looking like a dip, but that would not mean that you could expect the same odds. Check the Luteal Dip detector report to see if your chart fits the pattern discussed here.

Here is what we found:

The dip is present in both pregnancy and non-pregnancy charts. Our detector is very selective to avoid the detection of unclear patterns as much as possible.

For pregnancy charts, the dip is observed at an average of 8.6 DPO.

This pattern is observed on 1.6% of all charts. It is pretty rare due to the selectivity of our detector.

Charts exhibiting this pattern are 79.8% more likely to be pregnancy charts than non-pregnancy charts.

The data suggest that this pattern is indeed more likely to result in a pregnancy.



Fikk jo forhåpningene opp en god del mer nå :excited001
Men gjennomsnittlig dag for festedip her var tross alt også litt senere enn min dip. Uansett spennende da!
Spørs om jeg klarer å holde meg til 13 DPO før testing denne gang.
Klikk for å utvide …
Oj spennende. Trodde tidligste dipp var 6dpo, men her står det jo 5dpo, som min var. Eggløsning kan også ha kommet 12 timer etter peak, altså dermed samme dag, og da dipp på 6dpo.
 
Kine 95 skrev:
Jaja det er jo verdt å teste det ut :)

Det her er lengden jeg har som maks, så en endring til armhulene er jo egentlig en halvering av håret. Æææææ jeg vet ikke om jeg tørr lengre haha. Kanskje gå for nippel lengde i stedet da :smiley-ashamed004 Kan jeg klippet det kortere hvis det faktisk blir et problem. Jeg bare ser for meg at med mindre man har det i flette så vil en baby ta tak i håret sånn heeeele tiden :smiley-ashamed004

Vis vedlegget 467853

Trodde folk kom til å være sånn "Gjør det!!" her inne hahaha
Klikk for å utvide …
Misunnelig på det håret!!!! :arghh: :shy:
 
Back
Topp